COI.
close Submit Innovation
close
F&A / Services verified Verified Outcome TRL 9

AI for Non-PO Invoice Coding

domain Client: A global professional services firm handshake Provider: Genpact / HighRadius schedule Deploy: Q3 2019 (Deployment)
89 Impact
Enterprise Ready
Evidence Score: 5/10
Strength: High

Executive Summary

ANALYST: COI RESEARCH

For invoices that do not have a purchase order (Non-PO), manual coding to the General Ledger (GL) is a bottleneck. The firm deployed an AI engine that predicts the correct GL code, Cost Center, and Tax Code based on historical patterns and vendor category, automating the routing for approval.

rate_review Analyst Verdict

"Solving the 'tail spend' problem. PO-backed invoices are easy to match; Non-PO (utility bills, one-off services) are hard. AI prediction removes the burden from the AP clerk to 'guess' the accounting code, reducing re-classifications at month-end."

lock
Full Audit Report Available Includes Risk Register, Technical Specs & Compliance Data.

warning The Challenge

High volume of Non-PO invoices required manual review by senior accountants to assign the correct GL codes. Errors led to incorrect financial reporting and time-consuming journal entry corrections during the close process.

psychology The Solution

The AI model was trained on 2 years of historical invoice data. It scans incoming invoices and predicts the GL string with a confidence score. High-confidence predictions are auto-routed to the budget owner; low-confidence ones go to an AP clerk.

settings_suggest Technical & Deployment Specs

Integrations
ERP (Oracle/SAP)
Deployment Model
SaaS / AI
Data Classification
Financial
Estimated TCO / ROI
Medium
POC Summary (2018-01-01 to 2019-01-01)

"N/A"

shield Risk Register & Mitigation

Risk Factor Severity Mitigation Strategy
Model Drift Medium Quarterly retraining on recent data.
New Vendor Accuracy Medium Rule-based fallback for new vendors.

trending_up Impact Trajectory

Audited value realization curve

>80% auto-coding rate achieved Verified Outcome
Primary KPIReduction in month-end journal adjustments
Audit CycleFaster approval cycle time

policy Compliance & Gov

  • Standards: SOX
  • Maturity (TRL): 9
  • Evidence Score: 5/10
  • Data Class: Financial

folder_shared Verified Assets

description
Verified Case Study
PDF • Version 1
lock
verified_user
Technical Audit
PDF • Audited
lock
Security Architecture

The "Blind Verification" Protocol

How we verified these outcomes for A global professional services firm without exposing sensitive IP or identities.

Private
lock_person

1. Raw Evidence

Audit ID: #PRIV-922
Evidence: Direct SQL Logs
Public
public

2. Verified Asset

Outcome: Verified
Ref ID: #COI-922

Strategic Action Center

Identify your current stage and take the next step.

rocket_launch
Replicate This Success
Want similar results? Request a deployment consultation.
psychology_alt
Submit Challenge
Have a different problem? Submit your problem statement.
publish
Publish Case Study
Submit your own verified evidence.
thumb_up
Verify Impact
Audit your existing solution.