COI.
close Submit Innovation
close
Insurance verified Verified Outcome TRL 9

Active Cyber Insurance (Continuous Scanning)

domain Client: SMEs / Mid-Market Enterprises handshake Provider: Coalition / BinaryEdge schedule Deploy: 2017-Present
95 Impact
Enterprise Ready
Evidence Score: 5/10
Strength: High

Executive Summary

ANALYST: COI RESEARCH

A shift from static to 'active' insurance, where the provider continuously scans policyholders' external networks for vulnerabilities and alerts them to patch before a breach occurs.

rate_review Analyst Verdict

"The future model for cyber risk. It fundamentally changes the insurer relationship from 'payer of last resort' to 'security partner'. The data loop (scan -> alert -> patch) demonstrably lowers claims frequency."

lock
Full Audit Report Available Includes Risk Register, Technical Specs & Compliance Data.

warning The Challenge

Traditional cyber insurance relied on annual questionnaires ('Do you use firewalls?'). This provided a stale, point-in-time view of risk. Between renewals, clients would open new ports or fail to patch new vulnerabilities (CVEs), leading to preventable ransomware attacks and massive claims losses for insurers.

psychology The Solution

The provider acts as both a security company and an insurer. They continuously scan the public internet (using proprietary scanning tech) to monitor their policyholders' attack surface. If a critical vulnerability is detected (e.g., an exposed RDP port), the system automatically alerts the client and provides remediation steps. Coverage is contingent on maintaining basic hygiene.

settings_suggest Technical & Deployment Specs

Integrations
Email Alerting, API
Deployment Model
SaaS Platform
Data Classification
Vulnerability Data
Estimated TCO / ROI
Bundled with Premium
POC Summary ( to )

"N/A"

shield Risk Register & Mitigation

Risk Factor Severity Mitigation Strategy
False Positives Medium Human verification for complex alerts.
Client Fatigue Low Prioritize only critical vulnerabilities.

trending_up Impact Trajectory

Audited value realization curve

Reported 40% lower claims frequency than average Verified Outcome
Primary KPIReduction in time-to-patch for critical CVEs
Audit CycleReal-time visibility into portfolio accumulation risk

policy Compliance & Gov

  • Standards: NIST, GDPR
  • Maturity (TRL): 9
  • Evidence Score: 5/10
  • Data Class: Vulnerability Data

folder_shared Verified Assets

description
Verified Case Study
PDF • Version 1
lock
verified_user
Technical Audit
PDF • Audited
lock
Security Architecture

The "Blind Verification" Protocol

How we verified these outcomes for SMEs / Mid-Market Enterprises without exposing sensitive IP or identities.

Private
lock_person

1. Raw Evidence

Audit ID: #PRIV-559
Evidence: Direct SQL Logs
Public
public

2. Verified Asset

Outcome: Verified
Ref ID: #COI-559

Strategic Action Center

Identify your current stage and take the next step.

rocket_launch
Replicate This Success
Want similar results? Request a deployment consultation.
psychology_alt
Submit Challenge
Have a different problem? Submit your problem statement.
publish
Publish Case Study
Submit your own verified evidence.
thumb_up
Verify Impact
Audit your existing solution.