COI.
close Submit Innovation
close
Finance / M&A verified Verified Outcome TRL 9

Dynamic Watermarking for Deal Flow

domain Client: A tier-1 global investment bank handshake Provider: Internal Build / DRM Provider schedule Deploy: Q4 2018 (Standard)
88 Impact
Enterprise Ready
Evidence Score: 5/10
Strength: High

Executive Summary

ANALYST: COI RESEARCH

To prevent leaks of sensitive M&A documents, the bank implemented dynamic watermarking. When a banker or client opens a confidential PDF in the virtual deal room, the system dynamically overlays their own email address and a timestamp on the document. This deters screenshots and allows for immediate leak attribution.

rate_review Analyst Verdict

"Psychological and technical deterrent. In high-stakes M&A, leaks destroy deal value. Making the viewer personally liable via their own email watermark is the most effective policy enforcement mechanism available for read-only documents."

lock
Full Audit Report Available Includes Risk Register, Technical Specs & Compliance Data.

warning The Challenge

Confidential Information Memorandums (CIMs) were frequently leaked to the press. Traditional DRM could stop printing but couldn't stop someone taking a photo of the screen. Finding the leaker was impossible.

psychology The Solution

The Virtual Data Room (VDR) renders documents as images in the browser. A dynamic layer overlays the session user's ID (e.g., 'User: john.doe@bank.com') repeatedly across the page. This processing happens at the edge/view-time.

settings_suggest Technical & Deployment Specs

Integrations
VDR
Deployment Model
SaaS
Data Classification
Highly Confidential
Estimated TCO / ROI
Low
POC Summary (2017-01-01 to 2018-01-01)

"N/A"

shield Risk Register & Mitigation

Risk Factor Severity Mitigation Strategy
User Experience Low Watermark opacity tuning (visible but readable).
Analog Hole High Cannot stop cameras, but watermark ensures attribution.

trending_up Impact Trajectory

Audited value realization curve

100% of deal docs watermarked Verified Outcome
Primary KPIZero latency impact on viewing
Audit CycleDeterrence of casual screen capture

policy Compliance & Gov

  • Standards: MNPI Protection
  • Maturity (TRL): 9
  • Evidence Score: 5/10
  • Data Class: Highly Confidential

folder_shared Verified Assets

description
Verified Case Study
PDF • Version 1
lock
verified_user
Technical Audit
PDF • Audited
lock
Security Architecture

The "Blind Verification" Protocol

How we verified these outcomes for A tier-1 global investment bank without exposing sensitive IP or identities.

Private
lock_person

1. Raw Evidence

Audit ID: #PRIV-896
Evidence: Direct SQL Logs
Public
public

2. Verified Asset

Outcome: Verified
Ref ID: #COI-896

Strategic Action Center

Identify your current stage and take the next step.

rocket_launch
Replicate This Success
Want similar results? Request a deployment consultation.
psychology_alt
Submit Challenge
Have a different problem? Submit your problem statement.
publish
Publish Case Study
Submit your own verified evidence.
thumb_up
Verify Impact
Audit your existing solution.